![[GOOGLE PICASA]](./themes/speexx/images/picasa32x32.png "Sascha@Picasa"){kind=small}
![[GOOGLE PLUS]](./images/icons/plus48.png "Sascha@Google+"){kind=icon}
![[TWITTER]](./themes/speexx/images/twitter_newbird_white.s.png "Sascha@Twitter"){kind=small}
![ATOM FEED]](./themes/speexx/images/feed-icon-14x14.png "Atom 1.0 Feed"){kind=icon}
![[EMPHASIZE]](./images/icons/emphasize.80x15.gif "Martin Hartnagel"){kind=icon}
During the development process of the εοs-toolkit I tried out writing the documentation with APT-format. APT stands for Almost Plain Text. Writing documents is like writing in the early days of word-processors. The syntax is simple end easy to learn. If you are familiar with a wiki markup (MediaWiki, Confluence) it is quite easier. Okay, it is just another markup but thats okay.
Anyway, I'll switch to DocBook for the documentation. The reason: DocBook has a much better toolchain. There are nice word-processor like editors (XMLmind), mature transformation tools and so on. The toolchain is also the main reason I decide against DITA at this time.
Geschrieben von sascha am 12. April 2008 13:02:45 CEST